<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vote for next @CRITERION Blu-ray: Au Revoir Les Enfants, Down By Law, Howards End, Kwaidan, Picnic at Hanging Rock</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theblurayblog.com/2009/04/vote-for-next-criterion-blu-ray/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theblurayblog.com/2009/04/vote-for-next-criterion-blu-ray/</link>
	<description>Blu-ray disc news, reviews, releases, movies, films on PS3, Playstation, players, drives, Apple, Mac, OSX, HD, HDTV</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 20:16:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean William Menzies</title>
		<link>http://www.theblurayblog.com/2009/04/vote-for-next-criterion-blu-ray/#comment-85</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean William Menzies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 16:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theblurayblog.com/2009/04/vote-for-next-criterion-blu-r/#comment-85</guid>
		<description>I would say &quot;Howards End&quot; for the purely visual aspect. It was shot Super 35mm for 70mm blow up, but released mostly in 2:35 Scope. If it does make it to BD, it should be cropped for 70mm&#039;s 2:20 aspect ratio. The 2:35 Scope prints have so much extra picture to the left and right that it&#039;s bewildering, and not very attractive.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would say &#8220;Howards End&#8221; for the purely visual aspect. It was shot Super 35mm for 70mm blow up, but released mostly in 2:35 Scope. If it does make it to BD, it should be cropped for 70mm&#8217;s 2:20 aspect ratio. The 2:35 Scope prints have so much extra picture to the left and right that it&#8217;s bewildering, and not very attractive.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

